education (4) Virginia killings pending
.
.
John: Most massacre is due to military intention (60%), mass surveillance (10%) and profit making (30%). Take a look. https://chihaukam.blogspot.com/2023/08/look-at-this-articles-httpswww.html?m=1 . 66 Virginians died. Why?
.
Me: Cause, David belong to the Pentagon. David intend to carry out mass surveillance.
.
____________
.
Kelvin: See. I click a button. The registry table of the Windows of John will be rewrite. <-- Note: In fact, Kelvin used this method to attack me 30 times.
.
James: Why do we attack John only ?
.
Kelvin: Do you know why 66 Virginians die ? Because, David belong to the Pentagon. He has an intention of mass surveillance. You don't want to see another 66 Virginians dying.
.
James (Shaking head): No, I don't.
.
Kelvin: Let's attack John only.
.
___
.
Me: I Don't encourage anyone to kill people. Yet, in John's case, why didn't you on behalf of your students kill the people ?
Miuson: Kelvin only attack John. It's not a mass attack. It isn't serious.
Me: Why is mass attack serious ?
Miuson: The more mass attack, the more intention to learn.
.
Me: Yet, Kelvin can't attack John only.
.
Miuson: Kelvin only hack John. It's not serious. If it's not serious, the intention of learning is weak. Why should I kill people on behalf of my students.
Me: You can't think in this way. Mate.
__
John : After Kelvin attack me, nobody die. In the long run, it is disastrous. Why? Kelvin think wisely, "John is a good example. Nobody died.".
.
Me (stunned): Nobody die ?
.
John: Yes, Kelvin use his finger to point to my forehead and say to his students, "John is an example. He's attacked by me. It's educational. ".
.
Me (stunned): Educational ?
.
John: Kelvin say to the students surrounding, " You guys come close. You guys observe John Closely. He deserves being attacked. It's confirmed by Miuson. ".
.
Me: Confirm ?
.
John: Yes, Kelvin say to his students, " You soliloquize, 'what a terrific example it is. Thanks Professor. Kelvin. '. ".
.
Me (stunned): Thanks Professor. Kelvin ?
John: Yes,